Classification of cultivars of common peach (Persica vulgaris Mill.)

The existing classifications of peach cultivars are based on the morphological characteristics of vegetative and generative organs, and are of economic importance. The classification by N. I. Ryabov (1939) gained the greatest popularity. The entire cultural assortment of Persica vulgaris Mill. was divided by him into two varieties distinguished by the type of flower. A variety with a rose-shaped flower, P. vulgaris var. rosaeflora Rjab., is divided into 4 groups: 1. American early ripers; 2. Northern Chinese peaches of the ‘Chinese Cling’ type (with cartilage-like flesh texture); 3. cultivars of the Turkestan-Transcaucasian type; 4. South Chinese ‘Honey’ type peaches (honey peaches). A variety with a bell-shaped flower, P. vulgaris var. campanuliflora Rjab., is divided into two groups: 1. Iranian, the ‘Phillips Cling’ type (with cartilage-like flesh texture); 2. Iranian, the ‘Crawford’ type (with a fibrous flesh texture). The work was carried out in the collection orchard of the Research Institute of Plant Genetic Resources of Uzbekistan.
Research has shown that the groups do not have a specific geographical area and consist of cultivars from all around the world. Peach cultivars are grouped according to a set of morphological characteristics, therefore, the average values of basic biological properties within a group are very close and the differences are insignificant, which complicates the use of the classification for scientific purposes.
The proposed classification of peach cultivars is based on the botanical-geographical principle (Vavilov, 1935). It is proposed to divide all common peach cultivars into groups according to their geographical origin: 1. Chinese; 2. Transcaucasian; 3. European; 4. American; and 5. Central Asian. Each of these groups has its own distribution area. The biological properties of cultivars were formed under the influence of various soil and climatic conditions. Chinese peaches are frost and winter hardy and have a long dormancy period. However, in terms of commercial and taste qualities they are inferior to modern cultivars. They can be used in breeding for creating large-fruited, frostresistant, late flowering varieties. European cultivars were forming under different conditions and they should be used differentially; they are good source material for breeding cultivars with high commercial and taste qualities of fruits. Transcaucasian varieties are superior to other groups in terms of transportability. These are cultivars for canning and high quality processed products. They are relatively resistant to fungous diseases. American cultivars are distinguished by high commercial and taste qualities of fruits. Most cultivars are highly frost-resistant, but they are poorly winterhardy. They can be used for breeding highly productive cultivars with high commercial and taste qualities of fruits, with different ripening periods. Central Asian varieties have a long dormancy period, they are frost-, drought-, and soil salinity resistant. However, they are weakly resistant to fungous diseases. They can be used in breeding according to the indicated characteristics.

1. Alexeyev V.P. Plant resources of China. Fruit, vegetable, industrial and ornamental plants (Rastitelnyie resursy Kitaya. Plodovyie, ovoshchnyie, tekhnicheskiye i dekorativnyie rasteniya). Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plants Breeding. 1934; Suppl. 72. [in Russian]

2. Baimetov K.I. Economic and biological characteristics of the Transcaucasian peach cultivars. (Khozyaystvennobiologicheskaya kharakteristika Zakavkazskikh sortov persika). Plant resources of Central Asia and their breeding value. Tashkent; 1994. p.132-138. [in Russian]

3. Beketovsky A.N. Study of fruit characteristics in free pollination of peach. The Peach Culture. Collected Summaries (Materials) of Scientific Conference Held in Settl. Mertzavan in 1973. Yerevan: Hayastan Publishing House; 1977. p.105-117. [in Russian]

4. Dragavtsev A.P. Peach (Persik). Fruit growing in China. Moscow: Kolos; 1966. p.66-72. [in Russian]

5. Goncharova E.A. Assessment of resistance to different stress factors of fruits of berry and vegetable (juicy fruit) crops (Otsenka ustoychivosti k raznym stressovym faktoram plodov yagodnykh i ovoshchnykh (sochno plodovykh) kultur). Guidelines re. drought resistance. Leningrad: VIR; 1988. p.46-62. [in Russian]

6. Ryabov I.N. Classification of peaches (Klassifikatsiya persikov). Moscow: VASKHNIL Publishing Center; 1939. [in Russian]

7. Shaytan I.M. The culture of peach (Kultura persika (Biologiya, introduktsiya, agrotekhnika). Kiev: Urozhai; 1967. [in Russian]

8. Shoferistov Ye.P. Origin, gene pool and selective improvement of nectarine (Proiskhozhdeniye, genofond i selektsionnoye uluchsheniye nektarina) [dissertation]. Yalta; 1995. [in Russian]

9. Smykov A.V. Theoretical foundations of breeding and improvement of peach assortment in Southern Ukraine (Teoreticheskiye osnovy selektsii i sovershenstvovaniye sortimenta persika na yuge Ukrainy) [dissertation]. Simferopol; 2012 [in Russian]

10. Sokolova S.A., Sokolov B.V. Peach (Persik). Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaske Publishers; 1977. [in Russian]

11. Vavilov N.I. Botanical and geographical bases of breeding. Moscow, Leningrad: Selkhozgiz; 1935. [in Russian]

12. Vitkovskiy V.L. Fruit crops of world. St. Petersburg, Moscow, Krasnodar: Lan’ Publishers; 2003. [in Russian]

13. Yablonskiy E.A., Elmanova T.S., Kucherova T.P., Sholokhov A.M. Methodological recommendations for the complex assessment of winter hardiness of southern fruit crops (Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po kompleksnoy otsenke zimostoykosti yuzhnykh plodovykh kultur). Yalta: State Nikita Botanical Garden Publisher; 1976. [in Russian]